PeopleHeader

Huber Photo

Sarah K. Huber
Postdoctoral Fellow


HuberContact
LabLIne

Education
Ph.D., University of Massachusetts, 2007
B.S., Duke University, 1999

Postdoctoral
University of Utah, 2007 to present

Research Interests (download CV)
My PhD research broadly addressed processes related to the evolution of communication signals, morphological adaptation, and speciation using Darwin’s finches as a model system. I studied a population of the medium ground finch (Geospiza fortis) that posses a bimodal distribution of beak morphology. The songs of the two beak morphs differ in ways that we would predict given the role of the beak in singing and models of vocal tract function: large morphs produce songs with comparatively lower frequencies and vocal performance. The two beak morphs also mate assortatively over a range of ecological conditions, and gene flow is limited between beak morphs. These results support the hypothesis that ecological divergence can result in reproductive isolation, particularly when the target of ecological selection (beak morphology) also influences the evolution of mating signals.

My postdoctoral research examines host-parasite ecology in Darwin’s finches. Darwin’s finches have recently come under the threat of an invasive parasite, Philornis downsi. As larvae, P. downsi parasitize nestling birds and have been associated with high nestling mortality and reduced growth rates of Darwin’s finch nestling. My postdoctoral research, in collaboration with Dale Clayton, will explore the impacts of P. downsi on fitness of the medium ground finches (Geospiza fortis). We are also examining the evolution of possible host defenses to P. downsi, including immune response and behaviors such as preen and adult provisioning.

Sarah K. Huber Publications
1) Huber SK. In press. Effects of the introduced parasite Philornis downsi on nestling growth and mortality in Darwin’s finches. Biological Conservation.

2) Huber SK, Fernando de Leon L, Hendry AP, Bermingham E, Podos J. 2007. Reproductive isolation between sympatric morphs in a bimodal population of Darwin’s finches. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 274: 1709-1714.

3) Huber SK, Podos J. 2006. Beak morphology and song features covary in a population of Darwin’s finches (Geospiza fortis). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 88: 489-498.
Herrel A, Podos J, Huber SK, Hendry AP. 2005. Evolution of bite force in Darwin's finches: a key role for head width. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 18(3): 669-675.

4) Herrel A, Podos J, Huber SK, Hendry AP. 2005. Bite performance and morphology in a population of Darwin's finches: implications for the evolution of beak shape. Functional Ecology. 19: 43-48.

5) Podos J, Huber SK, Taft B. 2004. Bird song: The interface of evolution and mechanism. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 35: 55-87.

6) Huber SK, Lemons PP. 2002. Threats to Biodiversity: A Case Study of Hawaiian Birds.  National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, NY.
http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projects/cases/hawaii/hawaii.html
http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projects/cases/hawaii/hawaii_notes.html

7) Lemons PP, Huber SK. 2001. Dr. Collins and the Case of the Mysterious Infection.  National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, NY.
http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projects/cases/infection/infection.html
http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projects/cases/infection/infection_notes.html