|
|||
![]() |
Sarah E. Bush ![]() |
||
|
Field Guide to Collecting Parasites Research - October 31, 2009
To understand the observed pattern, I also investigated several potential barriers to parasite establishment. I found that preening, a bird’s primary defense against ectoparasites, is one barrier. When preening was experimentally impaired, lice were able to establish viable breding populations on novel hosts an order of magnitude smaller than the native host. These results were corroborated by proximal experiments showing that lice placed on small hosts were more susceptible to preening because they were physically unable to hide in the feather structures of smaller hosts. In contrast, lice could not survive on larger novel host species even when preening was impaired. This is surprising, in that additional experiments showed that lice could escape from preening on feathers of larger hosts, could eat feathers from larger hosts, and could remain attached to feathers of larger hosts (7,8). It is still unclear why large novel hosts pose a barrier to louse establishment. Perhaps pheromonal cues are disrupted on larger hosts, making it difficult for the lice to find mates. I hope to pursue this question in the future. As a postdoc, I am using a comparative approach to investigate ecological factors that influence the structure of parasite communities of terrestrial vertebrates in China. As the lead parasitologist on an NSF funded Biotic Surveys & Inventories project in southern China, I have processed over 2,000 individuals of more than 300 species of birds, mammals, frogs, and snakes. From these vertebrates I have collected parasitic fleas, flies, lice, ticks, mites, pseudoscorpians, leeches, acanthocephalans, nematodes, cestodes, trematodes, coccidia and hematozoans. To deal with this large and diverse collection of Chinese parasites, I have developed a network of collaborators from 15 different institutions who specialize on different parasite taxa. In addition to collecting parasites, I have also sampled Chinese birds for avian influenza, including H5N1 (9). These samples are being screened in collaboration with staff at the National Wildlife Health Center in Madison, WI. I have already published work on several of these groups (lice, flies, ticks, acanthocephalans, digeneans, and avian influenza); additional work on these parasites and other groups (nematodes, and hematozoans) is in preparation. As the Chinese parasites are prepared and further identified, it will soon be possible to compare populations among different field sites to test hypotheses about the structure of parasite communities. Initial results from these comparisons indicate that parasite species richness is dependent on forest fragment size. This result has important conservation implications. Host specific parasites are known to have gone extinct with their hosts (10), a phenomenon called “co-extinction”. The data from China suggest that local extinction of parasites may actually precede the extinction of their hosts. This has direct implications for the conservation of parasite species, which are typically overlooked in conservation efforts. Furthermore, these data suggest that the health of parasite communities can be used as an indication of the health of the host communities. In the future I will continue to use a comparative approach to investigate ecological factors that influence the structure of parasite communities. I am one of four Co-PIs on a new 5yr (2008-2013) NSF funded Biotic Surveys & Inventories project to survey the terrestrial vertebrates and parasites of the Philippines. One of the things that I find most exciting about these rigorous biotic surveys is that comparative data from these studies can be used to generate relevant, testable, hypotheses about the structure of parasite communities. For example, which parasites are most prone to local extinction? Are the most host specific parasites lost first? Are ectoparasites lost before endoparasites? Are parasites with complex life cycles lost before those with simple life cycles? How many parasites can coexist? What eco-morphological or behavioral differences are required for parasite coexistence? The question that I would most like to address in the near future is: What happens when a new host invades the community? Does the new host “share” its parasites? Or does the native parasite community essentially protect its host from invasive parasites? (11) I intend to pursue these questions experimentally with captive host-parasite systems, in addition to my comparative work in the Philippines, and elsewhere. 2. Taylor, L.H., Latham, S.M., and Woolhouse, M.E. 2001. Risk factors for human disease emergence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 356:983-989. 3. Daszak, P., Cunningham, A.A., and Hyatt, A.D. 2000. Emerging Infectious Diseases of Wildlife: Threats to Biodiversity and Human Health. Science 287:443-449. 4. Bush, S.E. and D.H. Clayton. 2006. The role of body size in host specificity: reciprocal transfer experiments with dove lice. Evolution 60: 2158-2167. 5. Clayton, D.H., S.E. Bush, B.M. Goates and Johnson, K.P.. 2003. Host defense reinforces host-parasite cospeciation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 100:15694-99. 6. Freeman, S. and Herron J. C., 2007, Evolutionary Analysis 4th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ; Futuyma, D. J., 2009. Evolution 2nd ed., Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. 7. Bush, S. E., E. Sohn and Clayton, D.H. 2006. Ecomorphology of parasite attachment: experiments with feather lice. J. Parasitology 92:25-31. 8. Bush, S. E. 2009. Does microhabitat flexibility facilitate host switching by parasites? Funct. Ecol. 23: 578-586. 9. Peterson, A. T., S. E. Bush, E. Spackman, D. E. Swayne, and H. Ip. 2008. Influenza A Virus Infections in Land Birds, People’s Republic of China. Emerg. Infect. Diseases 14: 1644-1646.
|
|||